Criminal Justice Morals Ends Justify Means Every Time - 825 Words

Criminal Justice Morals: Ends Justify Means Every Time (Essay Sample) Content: First Name Surname InstructorCourseDate "Ends Justify Means Every Time,"Life is full of choices that entire humanity meets in the daily undertakings. Ever since the time Memorial, philosophers have held the say that "Ends Justify Means Every Time." The say validates the fact that what one achieves at the end will justify the effort put in the cause of struggle to attain. The end will justify the ability of the character engaged, and mostly the life choices end in a positive way or in an adverse outcome. From the article posted, the philosophers deliberate on morality of dishonesty. The comments developed by the famous theologians posit that death kills on the body, but the ultimate end of a liar is a loss of eternal life. In choosing my career as criminal justice, I had to struggle with the notion that the trained police officers are better than class training. I spend long hours meditating of how the profession would be of help given that many in the law enforcement unit were police officers. Despite the vigorous training such officer's pass, the dream of becoming a best professional criminal Justice practitioner became real. The article in the web link reveals that law enforcement program occasionally fails to prepare the officers for the complicated and the critical decisions in using the police deceptions in handling issues. Police work is philosophically based on the balance of ideas. The decision undertaken at any point will justify the applicability of the law irrespective of how the enforcement training is attained (Johnson 10). In addition to the question of becoming an accepted criminologist in the latter ages, I was disturbed as to whether the career would lead to being a criminal in nature or becoming an expert in curbing criminality. The issue of integrity of the police officers in the society is ever in question due to less moral virtues in their justice dispensation. Instead of creating answers or solutions to problems, the law enforcement was viewed as people who concentrate in evils at the expense of all the right acts. The actions of saving individual life are considered evil in the Christian perception but the main aim is achieved of preserving the life in question (Val Van 3).Any compromise between good and evil only hurts the good and helps the evil.In understanding things in their broadest possible sense, the efforts put in place should deliver to realize better outcome. The police use of deception is permissible according to particular philosopher on the cause of actions. It is clear that a compromise between right and wrong ends up hurting the good and helping the bad increase. The right should remain ethical and all the decisions made will be sound. When evil is compromised, it allows the continuation of the bad and thus it averts all the good things that might have been realized. Commenting on the issue of morality, Emanuel Kant affirms that the decision made by the law enforcement agencies need to remain constitutional. For example, when a police officer opts to forgive a father who is carelessly over speeding in the road, and the father causes accident a head then he has not acted on the morality. Though it remains a dilemma, justice should remain applicable to all without boundary (Val Van 6). The compromise of the evil in the case above has helped the crime of causing the accident at the end of the scene. The truth remain that the evil act cannot work to attain good but will continue to act in pursuing the bad occurrence still. Critical decision made within the crimin...